head to head · open source

Immich vs Storj

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars, 6,980 forks, 740 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Storj has 3,282 stars, 429 forks, 361 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Immich leads on adoption by 3,387% (114,457 vs 3,282 stars). Immich is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Storj is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Immich has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Storj 13%. Immich was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Immich ★ 114K Storj ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Immich Storj
GitHub stars ★ 114K ★ 3.3K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.0K ⑂ 429
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Immich if

  • You weight community size — 114K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Immich profile →

pick Storj if

  • You want the Storj feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Storj fits your workflow better

full Storj profile →

About Immich

Immich is a high performance self hosted photo and video management solution — an AGPL 3.0 TypeScript project — for people and households who want their photo library on a server they own rather than in Google Photos.

read the full Immich overview →

About Storj

Storj V3 Network is an open source, Go based distributed cloud object storage project. It lives in the S3 compatible storage ecosystem and provides a platform and suite of distributed applications for storing files across a global network of computers. The project addresses the problem of keeping data available without depending on a single centralized storage provider. It encrypts files, breaks them into pieces, and stores those pieces across the network, while owner controlled retrieval is included.

read the full Storj overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do immich vs plakar immich vs pluton paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Immich vs Paperless-ngx Immich vs Ceph Immich vs Filestash Immich vs Garage Immich vs Alarik Immich vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Immich or Storj more popular?

Immich has 114,457 GitHub stars and Storj has 3,282. Immich has the larger community by that measure.

Are Immich and Storj free?

Both are open source. Immich is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Storj under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Immich and Storj?

Immich is written in TypeScript and Storj in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Immich or Storj?

Choose Immich if you want the larger community (114,457 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Storj if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.