head to head · open source

webgradients vs openharness

webgradients has 2,478 GitHub stars, 140 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. openharness has 664 stars, 56 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped today. webgradients leads on adoption by 273% (2,478 vs 664 stars). webgradients is written in CSS under MIT; openharness is written in C under MIT. webgradients has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, openharness 8%. openharness was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webgradients ★ 2.5K openharness ★ 664 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

webgradients openharness
GitHub stars ★ 2.5K ★ 664
License MIT MIT
Written in CSS C
Last push 2026-08-03 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 140 ⑂ 56
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webgradients if

  • You weight community size — 2.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CSS
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webgradients profile →

pick openharness if

  • You want the openharness feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and openharness fits your workflow better

full openharness profile →

About webgradients

WebGradients is a curated, MIT licensed collection of 180 ready made gradients distributed as CSS3, Sketch, PSD and Figma assets alongside a machine readable JSON dataset, aimed at frontend developers, designers and AI agent builders who need polished background colour treatments without composing them from scratch.

read the full webgradients overview →

About openharness

OpenHarness is MIT licensed open source software and hardware, written in C, that gives people who build with coding agents one place to run those agents alongside domain tools and live viewers for work beyond software — CAD parts, circuit boards, data analysis, and video.

read the full openharness overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

webgradients vs ant-design webgradients vs open-design webgradients vs manim webgradients vs anime webgradients vs hyperframes webgradients vs daisyui webgradients vs tabler webgradients vs motion webgradients vs layui webgradients vs lottie-ios webgradients vs vant webgradients vs primitives

Frequently asked questions

Is webgradients or openharness more popular?

webgradients has 2,478 GitHub stars and openharness has 664. webgradients has the larger community by that measure.

Are webgradients and openharness free?

Both are open source. webgradients is licensed under MIT and openharness under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webgradients and openharness?

webgradients is written in CSS and openharness in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webgradients or openharness?

Choose webgradients if you want the larger community (2,478 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openharness if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.