head to head · open source

hyperframes vs webgradients

hyperframes has 52,456 GitHub stars, 4,788 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped today. webgradients has 2,478 stars, 140 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. hyperframes leads on adoption by 2,017% (52,456 vs 2,478 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; webgradients is written in CSS under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, webgradients 6%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 52K webgradients ★ 2.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes webgradients
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 2.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript CSS
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 140
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick webgradients if

  • You want the webgradients feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CSS
  • You evaluated both and webgradients fits your workflow better

full webgradients profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About webgradients

WebGradients is a curated, MIT licensed collection of 180 ready made gradients distributed as CSS3, Sketch, PSD and Figma assets alongside a machine readable JSON dataset, aimed at frontend developers, designers and AI agent builders who need polished background colour treatments without composing them from scratch.

read the full webgradients overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs motion hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs lottie-ios hyperframes vs vant hyperframes vs primitives hyperframes vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or webgradients more popular?

hyperframes has 52,456 GitHub stars and webgradients has 2,478. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and webgradients free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and webgradients under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and webgradients?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and webgradients in CSS. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or webgradients?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (52,456 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose webgradients if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.