head to head · open source

webgradients vs figma-use

webgradients has 2,487 GitHub stars, 142 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. figma-use has 606 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. webgradients leads on adoption by 310% (2,487 vs 606 stars). webgradients is written in CSS under MIT; figma-use is written in TypeScript under MIT. webgradients has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, figma-use 7%. webgradients was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-agents, design, figma), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webgradients ★ 2.5K figma-use ★ 606 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

webgradients figma-use
GitHub stars ★ 2.5K ★ 606
License MIT MIT
Written in CSS TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-03 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 142 ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webgradients if

  • You weight community size — 2.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CSS
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webgradients profile →

pick figma-use if

  • You want the figma-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and figma-use fits your workflow better

full figma-use profile →

About webgradients

WebGradients is a curated, MIT licensed collection of 180 ready made gradients distributed as CSS3, Sketch, PSD and Figma assets alongside a machine readable JSON dataset, aimed at frontend developers, designers and AI agent builders who need polished background colour treatments without composing them from scratch.

read the full webgradients overview →

About figma-use

figma use is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that lets developers and AI agents read and write Figma files directly from the terminal, with more than 100 commands for creating shapes, text, components, styles, and exported images.

read the full figma-use overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

webgradients vs ant-design webgradients vs open-design webgradients vs manim webgradients vs anime webgradients vs hyperframes webgradients vs daisyui webgradients vs tabler webgradients vs motion webgradients vs layui webgradients vs lottie-ios webgradients vs vant webgradients vs primitives

Frequently asked questions

Is webgradients or figma-use more popular?

webgradients has 2,487 GitHub stars and figma-use has 606. webgradients has the larger community by that measure.

Are webgradients and figma-use free?

Both are open source. webgradients is licensed under MIT and figma-use under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webgradients and figma-use?

webgradients is written in CSS and figma-use in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webgradients or figma-use?

Choose webgradients if you want the larger community (2,487 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose figma-use if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.