head to head · open source

vant vs primitives

vant has 24,384 GitHub stars, 9,379 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. primitives has 19,309 stars, 1,247 forks, 356 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. vant leads on adoption by 26% (24,384 vs 19,309 stars). vant is written in TypeScript under MIT; primitives is written in TypeScript under MIT. vant has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, primitives 6%. vant was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ui-kit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vant ★ 24K primitives ★ 19K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

vant primitives
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 19K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-08-08
Forks ⑂ 9.4K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vant if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vant profile →

pick primitives if

  • You want the primitives feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and primitives fits your workflow better

full primitives profile →

About vant

Vant is a lightweight, customizable Vue UI library for mobile web apps, built for front end developers and teams that ship mobile first interfaces with Vue 2 or Vue 3.

read the full vant overview →

About primitives

Radix Primitives is an MIT licensed, TypeScript UI component library for React, maintained by WorkOS, that gives teams building design systems and web apps low level components focused on accessibility, customization and developer experience.

read the full primitives overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

vant vs ant-design vant vs open-design vant vs manim vant vs anime vant vs hyperframes vant vs daisyui vant vs tabler vant vs motion vant vs layui vant vs lottie-ios vant vs mojs vant vs Figma-Context-MCP

Frequently asked questions

Is vant or primitives more popular?

vant has 24,384 GitHub stars and primitives has 19,309. vant has the larger community by that measure.

Are vant and primitives free?

Both are open source. vant is licensed under MIT and primitives under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vant and primitives?

vant is written in TypeScript and primitives in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vant or primitives?

Choose vant if you want the larger community (24,384 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose primitives if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.