head to head · open source

vant vs mojs

vant has 24,384 GitHub stars, 9,379 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mojs has 18,778 stars, 888 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. vant leads on adoption by 30% (24,384 vs 18,778 stars). vant is written in TypeScript under MIT; mojs is written in CoffeeScript under MIT. vant has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, mojs 5%. vant was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

vant ★ 24K mojs ★ 19K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

vant mojs
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 19K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript CoffeeScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-07-30
Forks ⑂ 9.4K ⑂ 888
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick vant if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full vant profile →

pick mojs if

  • You want the mojs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CoffeeScript
  • You evaluated both and mojs fits your workflow better

full mojs profile →

About vant

Vant is a lightweight, customizable Vue UI library for mobile web apps, built for front end developers and teams that ship mobile first interfaces with Vue 2 or Vue 3.

read the full vant overview →

About mojs

mojs is a JavaScript motion graphics library, published on the npm registry as @mojs/core , that gives web developers a declarative API and built in components for animating HTML, shapes, swirls, bursts and staggers on the web.

read the full mojs overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

vant vs ant-design vant vs open-design vant vs manim vant vs anime vant vs hyperframes vant vs daisyui vant vs tabler vant vs motion vant vs layui vant vs lottie-ios vant vs primitives vant vs Figma-Context-MCP

Frequently asked questions

Is vant or mojs more popular?

vant has 24,384 GitHub stars and mojs has 18,778. vant has the larger community by that measure.

Are vant and mojs free?

Both are open source. vant is licensed under MIT and mojs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between vant and mojs?

vant is written in TypeScript and mojs in CoffeeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, vant or mojs?

Choose vant if you want the larger community (24,384 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mojs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.