head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs xiu
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. xiu has 2,338 stars, 239 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 266% (8,561 vs 2,338 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; xiu is written in Rust under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, xiu 10%. tubearchivist was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | xiu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 239 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xiu if
- You want the xiu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and xiu fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About xiu
English Doc 中文文档 Sponsors We would like to thank the following sponsors for their support of this project. Recall.ai API for meeting recordings If you’re looking for a meeting recording API, consider checking out Recall.ai, an API that records Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, in person meetings, and more. Overview Xiu is a simple,high performance and secure live media server written in pure Rust, it now supports popular live protocols like RTMP[cluster]/RTSP/WebRTC[Whip/Whep]/HLS/HTTP FLV. Features [x] Support multiple platforms(Linux/MacOS/Windows). [x] Support RTMP. [x] Support publishing or subscribing…
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or xiu more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and xiu has 2,338. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and xiu free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and xiu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and xiu?
tubearchivist is written in Python and xiu in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or xiu?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose xiu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.