head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs superstreamer
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. superstreamer has 1,454 stars, 60 forks, 30 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 489% (8,561 vs 1,454 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; superstreamer is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, superstreamer 4%. tubearchivist was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | superstreamer | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-02-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 60 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick superstreamer if
- You want the superstreamer feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and superstreamer fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About superstreamer
Superstreamer From video processing to playback in a matter of minutes. Documentation · Getting Started · Contributing Superstreamer is a self hostable platform that aims to simplify the complexities of video delivery. Transcode and package your media for online streaming with simple API calls and sane defaults, or craft dynamic HLS playlists on the fly with bumpers, ads and filters. Transcode your video file into separate quality tracks (eg; 1080p, 720p, 480p). Write HLS CMAF playlists directly to S3, ready for playback! Want to insert a bumper like Netflix? Stitch it as an HLS interstitial on the fly. Insert…
read the full superstreamer overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or superstreamer more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and superstreamer has 1,454. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and superstreamer free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and superstreamer under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and superstreamer?
tubearchivist is written in Python and superstreamer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or superstreamer?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose superstreamer if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.