head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs Openinary
tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars, 420 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Openinary has 403 stars, 55 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 1,997% (8,451 vs 403 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Openinary is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Openinary 14%. Openinary was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | Openinary | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.5K | ★ 403 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-08-28 | 2026-08-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 420 | ⑂ 55 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.5K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Openinary if
- You want the Openinary feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Openinary fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
Tube Archivist is a self hosted YouTube media server that downloads videos with yt dlp, indexes them with metadata from YouTube, and serves them back through a searchable web interface, built for people whose personal YouTube archive has grown past the point where folders and filenames still work.
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About Openinary
Openinary is an open source, self hostable media processing platform that delivers images and videos through URL based transformations, built for developers and platform teams who want Cloudinary style media delivery without depending on a proprietary SaaS provider.
read the full Openinary overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or Openinary more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars and Openinary has 403. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and Openinary free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Openinary under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and Openinary?
tubearchivist is written in Python and Openinary in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or Openinary?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,451 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Openinary if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.