head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs Openinary
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Openinary has 424 stars, 59 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 1,919% (8,561 vs 424 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Openinary is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Openinary 14%. tubearchivist was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | Openinary | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 424 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 59 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Openinary if
- You want the Openinary feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Openinary fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About Openinary
Openinary is an open source, self hosted media processing platform that includes: on the fly transformations for images and videos via URL built in S3 compatible storage with automatic caching smart optimization with WebP, AVIF, and modern codecs simple REST API with URL based transformations convenient admin dashboard for asset management For documentation and more examples, please visit [!TIP] ☁️ Openinary Cloud is in public alpha. Same engine, hosted for you. Sign up and start on the free plan, no card required. Try it → [!WARNING] Please keep in mind that Openinary is still under active development and…
read the full Openinary overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or Openinary more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and Openinary has 424. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and Openinary free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Openinary under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and Openinary?
tubearchivist is written in Python and Openinary in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or Openinary?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Openinary if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.