head to head · open source
tubearchivist vs httpx-static
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars, 433 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. httpx-static has 643 stars, 223 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 1.1 years ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 1,231% (8,561 vs 643 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; httpx-static is written in Go under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, httpx-static 35%. tubearchivist was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| tubearchivist | httpx-static | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.6K | ★ 643 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-25 | 2025-10-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 433 | ⑂ 223 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick tubearchivist if
- You weight community size — 8.6K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick httpx-static if
- You want the httpx-static feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and httpx-static fits your workflow better
About tubearchivist
more screenshots and video Table of contents Docs with FAQ, and API documentation Core functionality Resources Installing Getting Started Known limitations Port Collisions Common Errors Roadmap Donate Core functionality Once your YouTube video collection grows, it becomes hard to search and find a specific video. That's where Tube Archivist comes in: By indexing your video collection with metadata from YouTube, you can organize, search and enjoy your archived YouTube videos without hassle offline through a convenient web interface. This includes: Subscribe to your favorite YouTube channels Download Videos using…
read the full tubearchivist overview →
About httpx-static
go oryx The oryx is a group of isolate processes: 1. httpx static HTTP/HTTPS static server with API proxy. Winlin 2016.07.09
read the full httpx-static overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is tubearchivist or httpx-static more popular?
tubearchivist has 8,561 GitHub stars and httpx-static has 643. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.
Are tubearchivist and httpx-static free?
Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and httpx-static under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between tubearchivist and httpx-static?
tubearchivist is written in Python and httpx-static in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, tubearchivist or httpx-static?
Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose httpx-static if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.