head to head · open source

tubearchivist vs httpx-static

tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars, 420 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. httpx-static has 643 stars, 222 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. tubearchivist leads on adoption by 1,214% (8,451 vs 643 stars). tubearchivist is written in Python under GPL-3.0; httpx-static is written in Go under MIT. tubearchivist has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, httpx-static 35%. tubearchivist was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

tubearchivist ★ 8.5K httpx-static ★ 643 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

tubearchivist httpx-static
GitHub stars ★ 8.5K ★ 643
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-08-28 2025-10-15
Forks ⑂ 420 ⑂ 222
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick tubearchivist if

  • You weight community size — 8.5K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full tubearchivist profile →

pick httpx-static if

  • You want the httpx-static feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and httpx-static fits your workflow better

full httpx-static profile →

About tubearchivist

Tube Archivist is a self hosted YouTube media server that downloads videos with yt dlp, indexes them with metadata from YouTube, and serves them back through a searchable web interface, built for people whose personal YouTube archive has grown past the point where folders and filenames still work.

read the full tubearchivist overview →

About httpx-static

httpx static is a HTTP/HTTPS API proxy that ships as one component inside go oryx, a collection of isolated processes maintained under the SRS (Simple Realtime Server) project. The repository describes oryx as a group of separate processes, and httpx static is one of them: a static file server that also fronts API traffic over both HTTP and HTTPS. The project is written in Go and released under the MIT license, and it belongs to the SRS ecosystem, the media server family whose homepage is hosted at the ossrs/srs repository.

read the full httpx-static overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

mediamtx vs tubearchivist mediamtx vs go2rtc mediamtx vs streama mediamtx vs cloudflare-imgbed mediamtx vs node-media-server mediamtx vs lychee mediamtx vs seanime go2rtc vs streama next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

tubearchivist vs mediamtx tubearchivist vs go2rtc tubearchivist vs streama tubearchivist vs CloudFlare-ImgBed tubearchivist vs Node-Media-Server tubearchivist vs Lychee tubearchivist vs seanime tubearchivist vs Piwigo tubearchivist vs nginx-http-flv-module tubearchivist vs foss_photo_libraries tubearchivist vs tubesync tubearchivist vs UniversalMediaServer

Frequently asked questions

Is tubearchivist or httpx-static more popular?

tubearchivist has 8,451 GitHub stars and httpx-static has 643. tubearchivist has the larger community by that measure.

Are tubearchivist and httpx-static free?

Both are open source. tubearchivist is licensed under GPL-3.0 and httpx-static under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between tubearchivist and httpx-static?

tubearchivist is written in Python and httpx-static in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, tubearchivist or httpx-static?

Choose tubearchivist if you want the larger community (8,451 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose httpx-static if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.