head to head · open source

Storj vs Spinifex

Storj has 3,281 GitHub stars, 429 forks, 361 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Spinifex has 187 stars, 11 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped today. Storj leads on adoption by 1,655% (3,281 vs 187 stars). Storj is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Spinifex is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Storj has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Spinifex 6%. Spinifex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Storj ★ 3.3K Spinifex ★ 187 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Storj Spinifex
GitHub stars ★ 3.3K ★ 187
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 429 ⑂ 11
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Storj if

  • You weight community size — 3.3K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Storj profile →

pick Spinifex if

  • You want the Spinifex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Spinifex fits your workflow better

full Spinifex profile →

About Storj

Storj V3 Network is an open source, Go based distributed cloud object storage project. It lives in the S3 compatible storage ecosystem and provides a platform and suite of distributed applications for storing files across a global network of computers. The project addresses the problem of keeping data available without depending on a single centralized storage provider. It encrypts files, breaks them into pieces, and stores those pieces across the network, while owner controlled retrieval is included.

read the full Storj overview →

About Spinifex

Spinifex is an open source, AGPL 3.0 infrastructure platform built by Mulga that recreates the AWS service surface — EC2, EBS, S3, VPC, IAM, ALB/NLB, EKS, ECR, ECS, and RDS — on bare metal, on premises hardware, and edge sites, for teams that need AWS APIs and tooling but cannot or will not run in a hyperscaler cloud.

read the full Spinifex overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs storj immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs nextcloud immich vs ente immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs alarik n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Storj vs Immich Storj vs Paperless-ngx Storj vs Ceph Storj vs Filestash Storj vs Garage Storj vs Alarik

Frequently asked questions

Is Storj or Spinifex more popular?

Storj has 3,281 GitHub stars and Spinifex has 187. Storj has the larger community by that measure.

Are Storj and Spinifex free?

Both are open source. Storj is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Spinifex under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Storj and Spinifex?

Storj is written in Go and Spinifex in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Storj or Spinifex?

Choose Storj if you want the larger community (3,281 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Spinifex if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.