head to head · open source

Garage vs Storj

Garage has 4,552 GitHub stars, 176 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Storj has 3,281 stars, 429 forks, 361 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Garage leads on adoption by 39% (4,552 vs 3,281 stars). Garage is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0; Storj is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Garage has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Storj 13%. Garage was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Garage ★ 4.6K Storj ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Garage Storj
GitHub stars ★ 4.6K ★ 3.3K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 176 ⑂ 429
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Garage if

  • You weight community size — 4.6K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Garage profile →

pick Storj if

  • You want the Storj feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Storj fits your workflow better

full Storj profile →

About Garage

Garage is an S3 compatible distributed object storage service written in Rust and released under the AGPL 3.0, built for self hosting at small to medium scale where the cluster spans nodes in different physical locations.

read the full Garage overview →

About Storj

Storj V3 Network is an open source, Go based distributed cloud object storage project. It lives in the S3 compatible storage ecosystem and provides a platform and suite of distributed applications for storing files across a global network of computers. The project addresses the problem of keeping data available without depending on a single centralized storage provider. It encrypts files, breaks them into pieces, and stores those pieces across the network, while owner controlled retrieval is included.

read the full Storj overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs nextcloud immich vs ente immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs alarik n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Garage vs Immich Garage vs Paperless-ngx Garage vs Ceph Garage vs Filestash Garage vs Alarik Garage vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Garage or Storj more popular?

Garage has 4,552 GitHub stars and Storj has 3,281. Garage has the larger community by that measure.

Are Garage and Storj free?

Both are open source. Garage is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Storj under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Garage and Storj?

Garage is written in Rust and Storj in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Garage or Storj?

Choose Garage if you want the larger community (4,552 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Storj if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.