head to head · open source

Ceph vs Storj

Ceph has 17,057 GitHub stars, 6,504 forks, 1,353 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Storj has 3,281 stars, 429 forks, 361 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Ceph leads on adoption by 420% (17,057 vs 3,281 stars). Ceph is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence; Storj is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Ceph has attracted 38% as many forks as stars, Storj 13%. Ceph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (distributed-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ceph ★ 17K Storj ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ceph Storj
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 3.3K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.5K ⑂ 429
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ceph if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ceph profile →

pick Storj if

  • You want the Storj feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Storj fits your workflow better

full Storj profile →

About Ceph

Ceph is a scalable open source distributed storage system written in C++ and described as a platform for object, block, and file storage. It lives in infrastructure and operations storage solutions, where it provides a shared storage layer across distributed nodes rather than a single local disk.

read the full Ceph overview →

About Storj

Storj V3 Network is an open source, Go based distributed cloud object storage project. It lives in the S3 compatible storage ecosystem and provides a platform and suite of distributed applications for storing files across a global network of computers. The project addresses the problem of keeping data available without depending on a single centralized storage provider. It encrypts files, breaks them into pieces, and stores those pieces across the network, while owner controlled retrieval is included.

read the full Storj overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs ceph immich vs storj immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs nextcloud immich vs ente immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs alarik n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Ceph vs Immich Ceph vs Paperless-ngx Ceph vs Filestash Ceph vs Garage Ceph vs Alarik Ceph vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Ceph or Storj more popular?

Ceph has 17,057 GitHub stars and Storj has 3,281. Ceph has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ceph and Storj free?

Both are open source. Ceph has no licence declared in this registry, and Storj is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Ceph and Storj?

Ceph is written in C++ and Storj in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ceph or Storj?

Choose Ceph if you want the larger community (17,057 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Storj if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.