head to head · open source

Paperless-ngx vs Storj

Paperless-ngx has 45,323 GitHub stars, 3,131 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped today. Storj has 3,281 stars, 429 forks, 361 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Paperless-ngx leads on adoption by 1,281% (45,323 vs 3,281 stars). Paperless-ngx is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Storj is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Paperless-ngx has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Storj 13%. Paperless-ngx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Paperless-ngx ★ 45K Storj ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Paperless-ngx Storj
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 3.3K
License GPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 429
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Paperless-ngx if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Paperless-ngx profile →

pick Storj if

  • You want the Storj feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Storj fits your workflow better

full Storj profile →

About Paperless-ngx

Paperless ngx is a community supported, GPL 3.0 licensed document management system written in Python that turns physical paperwork into a searchable, indexed online archive, and it is built for individuals, homelab operators and small teams who want to scan, index and archive their documents on infrastructure they control.

read the full Paperless-ngx overview →

About Storj

Storj V3 Network is an open source, Go based distributed cloud object storage project. It lives in the S3 compatible storage ecosystem and provides a platform and suite of distributed applications for storing files across a global network of computers. The project addresses the problem of keeping data available without depending on a single centralized storage provider. It encrypts files, breaks them into pieces, and stores those pieces across the network, while owner controlled retrieval is included.

read the full Storj overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs storj immich vs nextcloud immich vs ente immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs alarik n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Paperless-ngx vs Immich Paperless-ngx vs Ceph Paperless-ngx vs Filestash Paperless-ngx vs Garage Paperless-ngx vs Alarik Paperless-ngx vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Paperless-ngx or Storj more popular?

Paperless-ngx has 45,323 GitHub stars and Storj has 3,281. Paperless-ngx has the larger community by that measure.

Are Paperless-ngx and Storj free?

Both are open source. Paperless-ngx is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Storj under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Paperless-ngx and Storj?

Paperless-ngx is written in Python and Storj in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Paperless-ngx or Storj?

Choose Paperless-ngx if you want the larger community (45,323 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Storj if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.