head to head · open source
Soketi vs Operational
Soketi has 5,633 GitHub stars, 364 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.7 years ago. Operational has 476 stars, 18 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Soketi leads on adoption by 1,083% (5,633 vs 476 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Operational is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Operational 4%. Operational was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Soketi | Operational | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.6K | ★ 476 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Vue |
| Last push | 2025-03-03 | 2026-10-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 364 | ⑂ 18 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Soketi if
- You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Operational if
- You want the Operational feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Vue
- You evaluated both and Operational fits your workflow better
About Soketi
soketi Next gen, Pusher compatible, open source WebSockets server. Simple, fast, and resilient. 📣 🤝 Supporting Soketi is meant to be open source, forever and ever. It solves issues that many developers face the one of wanting to be limitless while testing locally or performing benchmarks. More than that, itt is also suited for production usage, either it is public for your frontend applications or internal to your team. The frequency of releases and maintenance is based on the available time, which is tight as hell. Recently, there were issues with the maintenance and this caused infrequent updates, as well as…
read the full Soketi overview →
About Operational
Website Docs Self hosting Pitch Vision Operational.co is a open source Event tracking tool. Monitor signups, webhooks, cronjobs and more. Currently Swipekit Facebook ad library tool and youtubedescriptionextractor are using this in production. 🔍 View Live Demo See Operational in action with a demo account receiving test events. ✨ Key Features Get push notifications for critical events straight to your phone, or on the webapp Monitor critical events Trigger webhooks via action buttons Understand complex events via contexts(events in events) Usable on mobile as a progressive web app(can receive push notifications…
read the full Operational overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Soketi or Operational more popular?
Soketi has 5,633 GitHub stars and Operational has 476. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.
Are Soketi and Operational free?
Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Operational under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Soketi and Operational?
Soketi is written in TypeScript and Operational in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Soketi or Operational?
Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,633 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Operational if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.