head to head · open source

Soketi vs Operational

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. Operational has 477 stars, 17 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Soketi leads on adoption by 1,081% (5,634 vs 477 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Operational is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Operational 4%. Operational was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Soketi ★ 5.6K Operational ★ 477 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Soketi Operational
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 477
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Vue
Last push 2025-03-03 2026-07-26
Forks ⑂ 363 ⑂ 17
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Soketi if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Soketi profile →

pick Operational if

  • You want the Operational feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You evaluated both and Operational fits your workflow better

full Operational profile →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

About Operational

Operational is an open source event tracking and notification tool for technology products. It lives in the Node.js ecosystem and is distributed as a monorepo containing a Vue 3 single page application, an Express backend, an Astro marketing website, and a shared packages folder published to npm. The runtime stack is Node.js 18 or newer, MySQL 8.x, and Prisma as the data layer, with ClickHouse supported as an optional addition. The project is licensed under AGPL 3.0 and its topics list places it in the self hosted, SaaS, PWA, and push notification space.

read the full Operational overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs operational soketi vs timeplus automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs workbench uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Soketi vs AutoMQ Soketi vs Timeplus Soketi vs Sequin Soketi vs Trench Soketi vs Hook0 Soketi vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is Soketi or Operational more popular?

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars and Operational has 477. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Soketi and Operational free?

Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Operational under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Soketi and Operational?

Soketi is written in TypeScript and Operational in Vue. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Soketi or Operational?

Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,634 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Operational if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.