head to head · open source
Soketi vs SIP.js
Soketi has 5,633 GitHub stars, 364 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.7 years ago. SIP.js has 2,104 stars, 724 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Soketi leads on adoption by 168% (5,633 vs 2,104 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; SIP.js is written in TypeScript under MIT. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, SIP.js 34%. SIP.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (javascript, nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Soketi | SIP.js | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.6K | ★ 2.1K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2025-03-03 | 2026-06-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 364 | ⑂ 724 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Soketi if
- You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SIP.js if
- You want the SIP.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and SIP.js fits your workflow better
About Soketi
soketi Next gen, Pusher compatible, open source WebSockets server. Simple, fast, and resilient. 📣 🤝 Supporting Soketi is meant to be open source, forever and ever. It solves issues that many developers face the one of wanting to be limitless while testing locally or performing benchmarks. More than that, itt is also suited for production usage, either it is public for your frontend applications or internal to your team. The frequency of releases and maintenance is based on the available time, which is tight as hell. Recently, there were issues with the maintenance and this caused infrequent updates, as well as…
read the full Soketi overview →
About SIP.js
SIP Library for JavaScript Create real time peer to peer audio and video sessions via WebRTC Utilize SIP in your web application via SIP over WebSocket Send instant messages and view presence Support early media, hold and transfers Send DTMF RFC 2833 or SIP INFO Share your screen or desktop Written in TypeScript Runs in all major web browsers Compatible with standards compliant servers including Asterisk and FreeSWITCH Demo Want see it in action? The project website, sipjs.com, has a live demo. Looking for code to get started with? This repository includes demonstrations which run in a web browser. Usage To…
read the full SIP.js overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Soketi or SIP.js more popular?
Soketi has 5,633 GitHub stars and SIP.js has 2,104. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.
Are Soketi and SIP.js free?
Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SIP.js under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Soketi and SIP.js?
Soketi is written in TypeScript and SIP.js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Soketi or SIP.js?
Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,633 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose SIP.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.