head to head · open source

motion vs Plasmic

motion has 33,759 GitHub stars, 1,379 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plasmic has 7,048 stars, 726 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. motion leads on adoption by 379% (33,759 vs 7,048 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; Plasmic is written in TypeScript under MIT. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Plasmic 10%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

motion ★ 34K Plasmic ★ 7.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

motion Plasmic
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 7.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-27 2026-09-27
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 726
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick motion if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full motion profile →

pick Plasmic if

  • You want the Plasmic feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Plasmic fits your workflow better

full Plasmic profile →

About motion

Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.

read the full motion overview →

About Plasmic

Plasmic is an open source, MIT licensed visual builder for React that integrates with an existing codebase, aimed at developers and at the marketing, design, and technical users who build alongside them.

read the full Plasmic overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs plasmic ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

motion vs ant-design motion vs open-design motion vs manim motion vs anime motion vs hyperframes motion vs daisyui motion vs tabler motion vs layui motion vs lottie-ios motion vs vant motion vs primitives motion vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is motion or Plasmic more popular?

motion has 33,759 GitHub stars and Plasmic has 7,048. motion has the larger community by that measure.

Are motion and Plasmic free?

Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and Plasmic under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between motion and Plasmic?

motion is written in TypeScript and Plasmic in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, motion or Plasmic?

Choose motion if you want the larger community (33,759 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Plasmic if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.