head to head · open source

Plakar vs Pluton

Plakar has 2,062 GitHub stars, 92 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Pluton has 787 stars, 31 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Plakar leads on adoption by 162% (2,062 vs 787 stars). Plakar is written in Go under ISC; Pluton is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Plakar has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Pluton 4%. Plakar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Plakar ★ 2.1K Pluton ★ 787 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Plakar Pluton
GitHub stars ★ 2.1K ★ 787
License ISC Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 92 ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Plakar if

  • You weight community size — 2.1K stars and counting
  • You want the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Plakar profile →

pick Pluton if

  • You want the Pluton feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Pluton fits your workflow better

full Pluton profile →

About Plakar

Plakar is an open source backup engine written in Go for the infrastructure and operations ecosystem. It is powered by Kloset, an immutable data store, and it uses the ptar format for self contained archives. Plakar creates snapshots of data, stores them in encrypted and deduplicated repositories, and lets users inspect, verify, and restore the snapshots later.

read the full Plakar overview →

About Pluton

Pluton is an Apache 2.0 licensed, self hosted backup management platform written in TypeScript. It lives in the backup and recovery ecosystem, and it uses Restic for encrypted incremental backups and Rclone for cloud storage connectivity. The project provides a web interface for creating, scheduling, monitoring, and restoring backup jobs across local and remote storage destinations.

read the full Pluton overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs plakar immich vs pluton uptime-kuma vs plakar uptime-kuma vs pluton worldmonitor vs plakar worldmonitor vs pluton mall vs plakar mall vs pluton uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

Frequently asked questions

Is Plakar or Pluton more popular?

Plakar has 2,062 GitHub stars and Pluton has 787. Plakar has the larger community by that measure.

Are Plakar and Pluton free?

Both are open source. Plakar is licensed under ISC and Pluton under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Plakar and Pluton?

Plakar is written in Go and Pluton in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Plakar or Pluton?

Choose Plakar if you want the larger community (2,062 stars) or its ISC licence terms. Choose Pluton if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.