head to head · open source

hyperframes vs mojs

hyperframes has 51,996 GitHub stars, 4,737 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mojs has 18,778 stars, 888 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. hyperframes leads on adoption by 177% (51,996 vs 18,778 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; mojs is written in CoffeeScript under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mojs 5%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (animation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 52K mojs ★ 19K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes mojs
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 19K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript CoffeeScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-07-30
Forks ⑂ 4.7K ⑂ 888
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick mojs if

  • You want the mojs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches CoffeeScript
  • You evaluated both and mojs fits your workflow better

full mojs profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About mojs

mojs is a JavaScript motion graphics library, published on the npm registry as @mojs/core , that gives web developers a declarative API and built in components for animating HTML, shapes, swirls, bursts and staggers on the web.

read the full mojs overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs motion hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs lottie-ios hyperframes vs vant hyperframes vs primitives hyperframes vs Figma-Context-MCP

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or mojs more popular?

hyperframes has 51,996 GitHub stars and mojs has 18,778. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and mojs free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and mojs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and mojs?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and mojs in CoffeeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or mojs?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (51,996 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose mojs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.