head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs songloft

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars, 5,523 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped yesterday. songloft has 1,746 stars, 143 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 3,179% (57,244 vs 1,746 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; songloft is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, songloft 8%. songloft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K songloft ★ 1.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin songloft
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 1.7K
License GPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C# Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick songloft if

  • You want the songloft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and songloft fits your workflow better

full songloft profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About songloft

Songloft is a self hosted music server written in Go under Apache 2.0. It manages music files the user already owns and provides no built in copyrighted content. The project was renamed from MiMusic at version 2.0, with old GitHub and Docker paths kept as redirects for at least one year.

read the full songloft overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Invidious Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs Nuclear Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player Jellyfin vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or songloft more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars and songloft has 1,746. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and songloft free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and songloft under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and songloft?

Jellyfin is written in C# and songloft in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or songloft?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,244 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose songloft if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.