head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs podsync

Jellyfin has 57,271 GitHub stars, 5,527 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped yesterday. podsync has 1,961 stars, 314 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 2,820% (57,271 vs 1,961 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; podsync is written in Go under MIT. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, podsync 16%. Jellyfin was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K podsync ★ 2.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin podsync
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 2.0K
License GPL-2.0 MIT
Written in C# Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 314
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick podsync if

  • You want the podsync feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and podsync fits your workflow better

full podsync profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About podsync

Podsync is a free, MIT licensed Go service that turns YouTube or Vimeo channels, users, or playlists into podcast feeds, and it is built for people who want YouTube and Vimeo content delivered through a podcast client instead of the platforms' own apps.

read the full podsync overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Invidious Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs Nuclear Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player Jellyfin vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or podsync more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,271 GitHub stars and podsync has 1,961. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and podsync free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and podsync under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and podsync?

Jellyfin is written in C# and podsync in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or podsync?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,271 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose podsync if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.