head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs macro-crm

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars, 5,523 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped yesterday. macro-crm has 4,345 stars, 416 forks, 100 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 1,217% (57,244 vs 4,345 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; macro-crm is written in Rust under AGPL-3.0. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, macro-crm 10%. macro-crm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K macro-crm ★ 4.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin macro-crm
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 4.3K
License GPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C# Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 416
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick macro-crm if

  • You want the macro-crm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and macro-crm fits your workflow better

full macro-crm profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About macro-crm

Macro is an open source all in one team workspace written in Rust and SolidJS under AGPL 3.0. It combines email, messages, docs, tasks, agents, calls, file storage, pull requests, and CRM in one interface, with shared team level memory and @ linked objects. It lives in the open source collaboration and CRM software ecosystem.

read the full macro-crm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Invidious Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs Nuclear Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player Jellyfin vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or macro-crm more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars and macro-crm has 4,345. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and macro-crm free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and macro-crm under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and macro-crm?

Jellyfin is written in C# and macro-crm in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or macro-crm?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,244 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose macro-crm if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.