head to head · open source

hyperframes vs auto-animate

hyperframes has 52,195 GitHub stars, 4,762 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped today. auto-animate has 13,924 stars, 260 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. hyperframes leads on adoption by 275% (52,195 vs 13,924 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; auto-animate is written in TypeScript under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, auto-animate 2%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (animation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 52K auto-animate ★ 14K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes auto-animate
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-07-10
Forks ⑂ 4.8K ⑂ 260
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick auto-animate if

  • You want the auto-animate feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and auto-animate fits your workflow better

full auto-animate profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About auto-animate

AutoAnimate is a zero config, drop in animation utility that adds smooth transitions to a web application with a single line of code, aimed at JavaScript, React, Vue, and Solid developers who want motion in their interfaces without hand writing animation logic.

read the full auto-animate overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs motion hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs lottie-ios hyperframes vs vant hyperframes vs primitives hyperframes vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or auto-animate more popular?

hyperframes has 52,195 GitHub stars and auto-animate has 13,924. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and auto-animate free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and auto-animate under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and auto-animate?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and auto-animate in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or auto-animate?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (52,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose auto-animate if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.