head to head · open source

frp vs zoraxy

frp has 109,614 GitHub stars, 15,220 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. zoraxy has 5,490 stars, 323 forks, 159 open issues and last shipped yesterday. frp leads on adoption by 1,897% (109,614 vs 5,490 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; zoraxy is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, zoraxy 6%. zoraxy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (http-proxy, proxy, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K zoraxy ★ 5.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp zoraxy
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 323
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick zoraxy if

  • You want the zoraxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and zoraxy fits your workflow better

full zoraxy profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About zoraxy

Zoraxy is a general purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool, now written in Go, aimed at homelab owners, makers, and small operations teams who need to route traffic to several self hosted services without hand maintaining proxy configuration files.

read the full zoraxy overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or zoraxy more popular?

frp has 109,614 GitHub stars and zoraxy has 5,490. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and zoraxy free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and zoraxy under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and zoraxy?

frp is written in Go and zoraxy in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or zoraxy?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,614 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose zoraxy if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.