head to head · open source
frp vs WR.DO
frp has 110,395 GitHub stars, 15,306 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped yesterday. WR.DO has 2,291 stars, 363 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 4,719% (110,395 vs 2,291 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| frp | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 110K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 363 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick frp if
- You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About frp
frp README 中文文档 Sponsors frp is an open source project with its ongoing development made possible entirely by the support of our awesome sponsors. If you'd like to join them, please consider sponsoring frp's development. Gold Sponsors High performance residential and ISP proxies for developers 90M+ residential IPs worldwide. Rotating IPs, sticky sessions, and traffic that never expires. From $0.55/GB. Use RAPID10 for 10% off. Try it for free. The complete IDE crafted for professional Go developers The sovereign cloud that puts you in control An open source, self hosted alternative to public clouds, built for…
About WR.DO
WR.DO 一站式域名服务平台，集成短链服务、临时邮箱、子域名管理、文件存储和开放API接口。 官方站点 · 部署文档 · 反馈讨论 · English 简体中文 🌟 推荐 Claude Code 稳定 API 渠道：nbility.dev ，支持 claude opus 4 6 等主流 AI Coding 大模型🥳 版本说明 开源版 Demo：likedo.vercel.app 运营版 LikeDo：like.do ，集成 AI Agent 统一调度管理站内资源，内置激励共创系统，点击使用邀请码注册 。 截图预览 功能列表 🔗 短链服务 [功能列表] 支持自定义短链 支持生成自定义二维码 支持密码保护链接 支持设置过期时间 支持访问统计（实时日志、地图等多维度数据分析） 支持调用 API 创建短链 📮 域名邮箱服务 [功能列表] 支持创建自定义前缀邮箱 支持过滤未读邮件列表 可创建无限数量邮箱 支持接收无限制邮件 （依赖 Cloudflare Email Worker） 支持发送邮件（依赖 Resend） 支持 Catch All 配置 支持 Telegram 推送（多频道/群组） 支持调用 API 创建邮箱 支持调用 API 获取收件箱邮件 🌐 子域名管理服务 [功能列表] 支持管理多 Cloudflare 账户下的多个域名的 DNS 记录 支持创建多种 DNS 记录类型（CNAME、A、TXT 等）…
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or WR.DO more popular?
frp has 110,395 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,291. frp has the larger community by that measure.
Are frp and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between frp and WR.DO?
frp is written in Go and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, frp or WR.DO?
Choose frp if you want the larger community (110,395 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.