head to head · open source
frp vs WR.DO
frp has 109,502 GitHub stars, 15,213 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. WR.DO has 2,279 stars, 364 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 4,705% (109,502 vs 2,279 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; WR.DO is written in TypeScript under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, WR.DO 16%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| frp | WR.DO | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 110K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 364 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick frp if
- You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick WR.DO if
- You want the WR.DO feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and WR.DO fits your workflow better
About frp
frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.
About WR.DO
WR.DO free open source MIT TypeScript Next.js self hosted one stop domain service platform. It combines short link generation, unlimited domain email, Cloudflare subdomain management, S3 compatible file storage, open API, admin panel. It targets operators needing one control plane for DNS records, links, mailboxes, files, users.
read the full WR.DO overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or WR.DO more popular?
frp has 109,502 GitHub stars and WR.DO has 2,279. frp has the larger community by that measure.
Are frp and WR.DO free?
Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WR.DO under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between frp and WR.DO?
frp is written in Go and WR.DO in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, frp or WR.DO?
Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,502 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WR.DO if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.