head to head · open source

frp vs wireguard-install

frp has 109,545 GitHub stars, 15,219 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. wireguard-install has 2,663 stars, 455 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. frp leads on adoption by 4,014% (109,545 vs 2,663 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; wireguard-install is written in Shell under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, wireguard-install 17%. wireguard-install was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K wireguard-install ★ 2.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp wireguard-install
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 2.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 455
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick wireguard-install if

  • You want the wireguard-install feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and wireguard-install fits your workflow better

full wireguard-install profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About wireguard-install

wireguard install is an MIT licensed Shell installer for Ubuntu, Debian, AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, CentOS, Fedora, openSUSE and Raspberry Pi OS that stands up and manages a WireGuard VPN server on a Linux machine in a few minutes, and it is aimed at self hosters, system administrators and small teams who want their own VPN endpoint — typically on a cloud server, virtual private server or dedicated server — without configuring WireGuard by hand.

read the full wireguard-install overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or wireguard-install more popular?

frp has 109,545 GitHub stars and wireguard-install has 2,663. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and wireguard-install free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and wireguard-install under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and wireguard-install?

frp is written in Go and wireguard-install in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or wireguard-install?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,545 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose wireguard-install if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.