head to head · open source

frp vs SoftEtherVPN

frp has 109,506 GitHub stars, 15,212 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. SoftEtherVPN has 13,562 stars, 2,781 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 707% (109,506 vs 13,562 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; SoftEtherVPN is written in C under Apache-2.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, SoftEtherVPN 21%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K SoftEtherVPN ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp SoftEtherVPN
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 2.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick SoftEtherVPN if

  • You want the SoftEtherVPN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and SoftEtherVPN fits your workflow better

full SoftEtherVPN profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About SoftEtherVPN

SoftEther VPN is an open source, cross platform, multi protocol VPN server and client, written in C and licensed under Apache 2.0, intended for administrators and self hosters who need one program to serve many VPN protocols instead of running several separate daemons.

read the full SoftEtherVPN overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs sliver frp vs smartdns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or SoftEtherVPN more popular?

frp has 109,506 GitHub stars and SoftEtherVPN has 13,562. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and SoftEtherVPN free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SoftEtherVPN under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and SoftEtherVPN?

frp is written in Go and SoftEtherVPN in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or SoftEtherVPN?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,506 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SoftEtherVPN if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.