head to head · open source
frp vs sliver
frp has 110,395 GitHub stars, 15,306 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sliver has 12,218 stars, 1,641 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 804% (110,395 vs 12,218 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; sliver is written in Go under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, sliver 13%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| frp | sliver | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 110K | ★ 12K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick frp if
- You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick sliver if
- You want the sliver feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and sliver fits your workflow better
About frp
frp README 中文文档 Sponsors frp is an open source project with its ongoing development made possible entirely by the support of our awesome sponsors. If you'd like to join them, please consider sponsoring frp's development. Gold Sponsors High performance residential and ISP proxies for developers 90M+ residential IPs worldwide. Rotating IPs, sticky sessions, and traffic that never expires. From $0.55/GB. Use RAPID10 for 10% off. Try it for free. The complete IDE crafted for professional Go developers The sovereign cloud that puts you in control An open source, self hosted alternative to public clouds, built for…
About sliver
Sliver Sliver is an open source cross platform adversary emulation/red team framework, it can be used by organizations of all sizes to perform security testing. Sliver's implants support C2 over Mutual TLS (mTLS), WireGuard, HTTP(S), and DNS and are dynamically compiled with per binary asymmetric encryption keys. The server and client support MacOS, Windows, and Linux. Implants are supported on MacOS, Windows, and Linux (and possibly every Golang compiler target but we've not tested them all). Visit for tutorials and documentation. Features Dynamic code generation Compile time obfuscation Multiplayer mode Staged…
read the full sliver overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or sliver more popular?
frp has 110,395 GitHub stars and sliver has 12,218. frp has the larger community by that measure.
Are frp and sliver free?
Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sliver under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between frp and sliver?
frp is written in Go and sliver in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, frp or sliver?
Choose frp if you want the larger community (110,395 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sliver if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.