head to head · open source

frp vs sliver

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars, 15,213 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. sliver has 11,852 stars, 1,587 forks, 222 open issues and last shipped yesterday. frp leads on adoption by 824% (109,502 vs 11,852 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; sliver is written in Go under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, sliver 13%. sliver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K sliver ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp sliver
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick sliver if

  • You want the sliver feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and sliver fits your workflow better

full sliver profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About sliver

Sliver is an open source, cross platform adversary emulation and red team framework written in Go, used by security teams of all sizes to perform authorized security testing with implants that support command and control over Mutual TLS (mTLS), WireGuard, HTTP(S), and DNS.

read the full sliver overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs smartdns frp vs OpenSurge-for-Mac frp vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or sliver more popular?

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars and sliver has 11,852. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and sliver free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and sliver under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and sliver?

frp is written in Go and sliver in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or sliver?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,502 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose sliver if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.