head to head · open source

frp vs pivpn

frp has 109,524 GitHub stars, 15,214 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. pivpn has 8,043 stars, 682 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 1,262% (109,524 vs 8,043 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; pivpn is written in Shell under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, pivpn 8%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K pivpn ★ 8.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp pivpn
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 8.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-08-30
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 682
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick pivpn if

  • You want the pivpn feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and pivpn fits your workflow better

full pivpn profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About pivpn

PiVPN is a set of open source shell scripts that turns a Raspberry Pi, or an Ubuntu or Debian server, into a self hosted VPN server running WireGuard or OpenVPN, and it is built for people who want a cost effective personal VPN at home without having to become a networking expert.

read the full pivpn overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs SoftEtherVPN

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or pivpn more popular?

frp has 109,524 GitHub stars and pivpn has 8,043. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and pivpn free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pivpn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and pivpn?

frp is written in Go and pivpn in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or pivpn?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,524 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pivpn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.