head to head · open source

frp vs piko

frp has 109,722 GitHub stars, 15,231 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. piko has 2,194 stars, 89 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 4,901% (109,722 vs 2,194 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; piko is written in Go under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, piko 4%. piko was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (http-proxy, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K piko ★ 2.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp piko
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 89
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick piko if

  • You want the piko feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and piko fits your workflow better

full piko profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About piko

Piko is an open source reverse proxy and tunneling server in Go that lets you reach services with no public route by having them open outbound connections, and it is aimed at teams that need to serve production traffic or expose internal services from Kubernetes.

read the full piko overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or piko more popular?

frp has 109,722 GitHub stars and piko has 2,194. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and piko free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and piko under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and piko?

frp is written in Go and piko in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or piko?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,722 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose piko if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.