head to head · open source
frp vs numa
frp has 110,568 GitHub stars, 15,317 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. numa has 1,980 stars, 141 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 5,484% (110,568 vs 1,980 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; numa is written in Rust under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, numa 7%. numa was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| frp | numa | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 111K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-10 | 2026-11-10 |
| Forks | ⑂ 15K | ⑂ 141 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick frp if
- You weight community size — 111K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick numa if
- You want the numa feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and numa fits your workflow better
About frp
frp README 中文文档 Sponsors frp is an open source project with its ongoing development made possible entirely by the support of our awesome sponsors. If you'd like to join them, please consider sponsoring frp's development. Gold Sponsors High performance residential and ISP proxies for developers 90M+ residential IPs worldwide. Rotating IPs, sticky sessions, and traffic that never expires. From $0.55/GB. Use RAPID10 for 10% off. Try it for free. The complete IDE crafted for professional Go developers The sovereign cloud that puts you in control An open source, self hosted alternative to public clouds, built for…
About numa
Numa DNS you own. Everywhere you go. — numa.rs A portable DNS resolver in a single binary. Block ads on any network, name your local services ( frontend.numa ), override any hostname with auto revert, and seal every outbound query with ODoH (RFC 9230) so no single party sees both who you are and what you asked — all from your laptop, no cloud account or Raspberry Pi required. Built from scratch in Rust. Zero DNS libraries. Caching, ad blocking, and local service domains out of the box. Optional recursive resolution from root nameservers with full DNSSEC chain of trust validation, plus a DNS over TLS listener for…
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or numa more popular?
frp has 110,568 GitHub stars and numa has 1,980. frp has the larger community by that measure.
Are frp and numa free?
Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and numa under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between frp and numa?
frp is written in Go and numa in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, frp or numa?
Choose frp if you want the larger community (110,568 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose numa if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.