head to head · open source

frp vs goshs

frp has 109,722 GitHub stars, 15,235 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. goshs has 987 stars, 58 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 11,017% (109,722 vs 987 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; goshs is written in Go under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, goshs 6%. goshs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K goshs ★ 987 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp goshs
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 987
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 58
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick goshs if

  • You want the goshs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and goshs fits your workflow better

full goshs profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About goshs

goshs is a single binary file server written in Go for red teamers, CTF players, and developers who need more capability than python3 m http.server without configuring Apache.

read the full goshs overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or goshs more popular?

frp has 109,722 GitHub stars and goshs has 987. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and goshs free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and goshs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and goshs?

frp is written in Go and goshs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or goshs?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,722 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose goshs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.