head to head · open source

frp vs FastTunnel

frp has 109,775 GitHub stars, 15,236 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. FastTunnel has 1,702 stars, 341 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 6,350% (109,775 vs 1,702 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; FastTunnel is written in C# under Apache-2.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, FastTunnel 20%. FastTunnel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 5 topic tags (http-proxy, nat, proxy, reverse-proxy), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K FastTunnel ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp FastTunnel
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 341
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick FastTunnel if

  • You want the FastTunnel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and FastTunnel fits your workflow better

full FastTunnel profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About FastTunnel

FastTunnel is a cross platform intranet penetration framework written in C that lets developers and operators expose services running on machines behind NAT to the public internet.

read the full FastTunnel overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or FastTunnel more popular?

frp has 109,775 GitHub stars and FastTunnel has 1,702. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and FastTunnel free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FastTunnel under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and FastTunnel?

frp is written in Go and FastTunnel in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or FastTunnel?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,775 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FastTunnel if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.