head to head · open source

frp vs DnsServer

frp has 109,506 GitHub stars, 15,212 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. DnsServer has 9,921 stars, 785 forks, 187 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 1,004% (109,506 vs 9,921 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; DnsServer is written in C# under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, DnsServer 8%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K DnsServer ★ 9.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp DnsServer
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 9.9K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 785
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick DnsServer if

  • You want the DnsServer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and DnsServer fits your workflow better

full DnsServer profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About DnsServer

Technitium DNS Server is an open source, cross platform authoritative and recursive DNS server written in C under GPL 3.0, aimed at anyone who wants to self host DNS resolution for privacy and security — a home network on a Raspberry Pi, or an organisation that needs encrypted DNS, network wide block lists, and centralised management.

read the full DnsServer overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs SoftEtherVPN frp vs sliver

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or DnsServer more popular?

frp has 109,506 GitHub stars and DnsServer has 9,921. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and DnsServer free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and DnsServer under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and DnsServer?

frp is written in Go and DnsServer in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or DnsServer?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,506 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose DnsServer if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.