head to head · open source

frp vs DnsClient.NET

frp has 109,722 GitHub stars, 15,231 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. DnsClient.NET has 880 stars, 149 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. frp leads on adoption by 12,368% (109,722 vs 880 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; DnsClient.NET is written in C# under Apache-2.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, DnsClient.NET 17%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K DnsClient.NET ★ 880 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp DnsClient.NET
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 880
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-03-01
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 149
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick DnsClient.NET if

  • You want the DnsClient.NET feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and DnsClient.NET fits your workflow better

full DnsClient.NET profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About DnsClient.NET

DnsClient.NET is a high performance open source DNS lookup library for .NET developers who need to query DNS records programmatically from C applications.

read the full DnsClient.NET overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or DnsClient.NET more popular?

frp has 109,722 GitHub stars and DnsClient.NET has 880. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and DnsClient.NET free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and DnsClient.NET under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and DnsClient.NET?

frp is written in Go and DnsClient.NET in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or DnsClient.NET?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,722 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose DnsClient.NET if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.