head to head · open source

frp vs dns.toys

frp has 109,639 GitHub stars, 15,224 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. dns.toys has 2,828 stars, 186 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. frp leads on adoption by 3,777% (109,639 vs 2,828 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; dns.toys is written in Go under MIT. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, dns.toys 7%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K dns.toys ★ 2.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp dns.toys
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 2.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-02-26
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 186
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick dns.toys if

  • You want the dns.toys feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dns.toys fits your workflow better

full dns.toys profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About dns.toys

dns.toys is an MIT licensed DNS server, written in Go, that takes creative liberties with the DNS protocol to deliver everyday utilities — weather, world time, unit and currency conversion, IP lookup and more — to anyone with a terminal and a dig command.

read the full dns.toys overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or dns.toys more popular?

frp has 109,639 GitHub stars and dns.toys has 2,828. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and dns.toys free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dns.toys under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and dns.toys?

frp is written in Go and dns.toys in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or dns.toys?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,639 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dns.toys if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.