head to head · open source

frp vs dns-proxy-server

frp has 109,748 GitHub stars, 15,233 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. dns-proxy-server has 854 stars, 81 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. frp leads on adoption by 12,751% (109,748 vs 854 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; dns-proxy-server is written in Java under Apache-2.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, dns-proxy-server 9%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K dns-proxy-server ★ 854 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp dns-proxy-server
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 854
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-04-29
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 81
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick dns-proxy-server if

  • You want the dns-proxy-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and dns-proxy-server fits your workflow better

full dns-proxy-server profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About dns-proxy-server

dns proxy server (DPS) is a lightweight DNS server for developers and server administrators who need hostnames to resolve differently depending on Docker containers, local configuration, or the internet.

read the full dns-proxy-server overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 116K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or dns-proxy-server more popular?

frp has 109,748 GitHub stars and dns-proxy-server has 854. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and dns-proxy-server free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dns-proxy-server under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and dns-proxy-server?

frp is written in Go and dns-proxy-server in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or dns-proxy-server?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,748 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dns-proxy-server if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.