head to head · open source

Filestash vs Spinifex

Filestash has 14,690 GitHub stars, 1,004 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Spinifex has 179 stars, 10 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Filestash leads on adoption by 8,107% (14,690 vs 179 stars). Filestash is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Spinifex is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Filestash has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Spinifex 6%. Filestash was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Filestash ★ 15K Spinifex ★ 179 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Filestash Spinifex
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 179
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 10
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Filestash if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Filestash profile →

pick Spinifex if

  • You want the Spinifex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Spinifex fits your workflow better

full Spinifex profile →

About Filestash

Filestash is a Go, AGPL 3.0 licensed universal file storage client for enterprise storage. It lives in Infrastructure & Operations / Storage Solutions. It began as a storage agnostic Dropbox like file manager that speaks FTP, SFTP, S3, SMB, WebDAV, IPFS, and about 20 more protocols. It has three products: a browser based web client, native clients for macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, and iPhone, and gateways for exposing storage over protocols.

read the full Filestash overview →

About Spinifex

Spinifex is an open source, AGPL 3.0 infrastructure platform built by Mulga that recreates the AWS service surface — EC2, EBS, S3, VPC, IAM, ALB/NLB, EKS, ECR, ECS, and RDS — on bare metal, on premises hardware, and edge sites, for teams that need AWS APIs and tooling but cannot or will not run in a hyperscaler cloud.

read the full Spinifex overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs filestash immich vs spinifex immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Filestash vs Immich Filestash vs Paperless-ngx Filestash vs Ceph Filestash vs Garage Filestash vs Storj Filestash vs Alarik

Frequently asked questions

Is Filestash or Spinifex more popular?

Filestash has 14,690 GitHub stars and Spinifex has 179. Filestash has the larger community by that measure.

Are Filestash and Spinifex free?

Both are open source. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Spinifex under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Filestash and Spinifex?

Filestash is written in Go and Spinifex in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Filestash or Spinifex?

Choose Filestash if you want the larger community (14,690 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Spinifex if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.