head to head · open source

Filestash vs Alarik

Filestash has 14,690 GitHub stars, 1,004 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Alarik has 538 stars, 6 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. Filestash leads on adoption by 2,630% (14,690 vs 538 stars). Filestash is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Alarik is written in Swift under Apache-2.0. Filestash has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Alarik 1%. Filestash was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Filestash ★ 15K Alarik ★ 538 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Filestash Alarik
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 538
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Swift
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 6
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Filestash if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Filestash profile →

pick Alarik if

  • You want the Alarik feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Alarik fits your workflow better

full Alarik profile →

About Filestash

Filestash is a Go, AGPL 3.0 licensed universal file storage client for enterprise storage. It lives in Infrastructure & Operations / Storage Solutions. It began as a storage agnostic Dropbox like file manager that speaks FTP, SFTP, S3, SMB, WebDAV, IPFS, and about 20 more protocols. It has three products: a browser based web client, native clients for macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, and iPhone, and gateways for exposing storage over protocols.

read the full Filestash overview →

About Alarik

Alarik is a high performance, self hosted S3 compatible object storage system written in Swift and licensed under Apache 2.0, built for developers and platform teams that want an open alternative to MinIO and RustFS.

read the full Alarik overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs filestash immich vs alarik immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Filestash vs Immich Filestash vs Paperless-ngx Filestash vs Ceph Filestash vs Garage Filestash vs Storj Filestash vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Filestash or Alarik more popular?

Filestash has 14,690 GitHub stars and Alarik has 538. Filestash has the larger community by that measure.

Are Filestash and Alarik free?

Both are open source. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Alarik under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Filestash and Alarik?

Filestash is written in Go and Alarik in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Filestash or Alarik?

Choose Filestash if you want the larger community (14,690 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Alarik if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.