head to head · open source

Filestash vs Storj

Filestash has 14,690 GitHub stars, 1,004 forks, 126 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Storj has 3,282 stars, 429 forks, 361 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Filestash leads on adoption by 348% (14,690 vs 3,282 stars). Filestash is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; Storj is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. Filestash has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Storj 13%. Filestash was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Filestash ★ 15K Storj ★ 3.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Filestash Storj
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 3.3K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 429
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Filestash if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Filestash profile →

pick Storj if

  • You want the Storj feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Storj fits your workflow better

full Storj profile →

About Filestash

Filestash is a Go, AGPL 3.0 licensed universal file storage client for enterprise storage. It lives in Infrastructure & Operations / Storage Solutions. It began as a storage agnostic Dropbox like file manager that speaks FTP, SFTP, S3, SMB, WebDAV, IPFS, and about 20 more protocols. It has three products: a browser based web client, native clients for macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, and iPhone, and gateways for exposing storage over protocols.

read the full Filestash overview →

About Storj

Storj V3 Network is an open source, Go based distributed cloud object storage project. It lives in the S3 compatible storage ecosystem and provides a platform and suite of distributed applications for storing files across a global network of computers. The project addresses the problem of keeping data available without depending on a single centralized storage provider. It encrypts files, breaks them into pieces, and stores those pieces across the network, while owner controlled retrieval is included.

read the full Storj overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs filestash immich vs storj immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs garage immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Filestash vs Immich Filestash vs Paperless-ngx Filestash vs Ceph Filestash vs Garage Filestash vs Alarik Filestash vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Filestash or Storj more popular?

Filestash has 14,690 GitHub stars and Storj has 3,282. Filestash has the larger community by that measure.

Are Filestash and Storj free?

Both are open source. Filestash is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Storj under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Filestash and Storj?

Filestash is written in Go and Storj in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Filestash or Storj?

Choose Filestash if you want the larger community (14,690 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Storj if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.