head to head · open source
espectre vs gpt-home
espectre has 9,728 GitHub stars, 739 forks, 13 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gpt-home has 652 stars, 68 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. espectre leads on adoption by 1,392% (9,728 vs 652 stars). espectre is written in Python under GPL-3.0; gpt-home is written in Python under GPL-3.0. espectre has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, gpt-home 10%. espectre was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| espectre | gpt-home | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 9.7K | ★ 652 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 739 | ⑂ 68 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick espectre if
- You weight community size — 9.7K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick gpt-home if
- You want the gpt-home feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and gpt-home fits your workflow better
About espectre
ESPectre Turn an ESP32 into a private, local Wi Fi motion sensor. When someone moves through a room, they change the way Wi Fi signals travel through it. ESPectre reads those changes and reports motion in real time. No camera, no microphone, no wearable, and no dedicated radar hardware: just a supported ESP32 and the Wi Fi network already in the room. ESPectre is an open source platform that brings together ready to flash firmware, an embeddable C++ SDK, a MicroPython implementation, browser tools, a host CLI, an open dataset, open model weights, and the research workflow used to build and validate the…
read the full espectre overview →
About gpt-home
🏠 GPT Home 🤖💬 ChatGPT at home! Basically a better Google Nest Hub or Amazon Alexa home assistant. Built on the Raspberry P iusing LiteLLM and LangGraph. This guide will explain how to build your own. It's pretty straight forward. You can also use this as a reference for building other projects on the Raspberry Pi. Theoretically, the app should run on any linux system thanks to docker, but I can only vouch for the versions listed in the compatibility table. You should be able use any plug and play USB/3.5mm speaker or microphone as long as it's supported by ALSA or PortAudio. 📦 Integrations ✅ OpenAI ✅ Spotify…
read the full gpt-home overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is espectre or gpt-home more popular?
espectre has 9,728 GitHub stars and gpt-home has 652. espectre has the larger community by that measure.
Are espectre and gpt-home free?
Both are open source. espectre is licensed under GPL-3.0 and gpt-home under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between espectre and gpt-home?
espectre is written in Python and gpt-home in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, espectre or gpt-home?
Choose espectre if you want the larger community (9,728 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose gpt-home if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.