head to head · open source
CrateDB vs SmartIR
CrateDB has 4,449 GitHub stars, 621 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SmartIR has 2,855 stars, 1,251 forks, 199 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CrateDB leads on adoption by 56% (4,449 vs 2,855 stars). CrateDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0; SmartIR is written in Python under MIT. CrateDB has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, SmartIR 44%. CrateDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (iot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CrateDB | SmartIR | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.4K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 621 | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CrateDB if
- You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SmartIR if
- You want the SmartIR feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and SmartIR fits your workflow better
About CrateDB
.. image:: docs/ static/crate logo.svg :alt: CrateDB :target: .. image:: :target: .. image:: :target: .. image:: :target: Help us improve CrateDB by taking our User Survey! About ===== CrateDB is a distributed SQL database that makes it simple to store and analyze massive amounts of data in real time. CrateDB offers the benefits of an SQL database and the scalability and flexibility typically associated with NoSQL databases. Modest CrateDB clusters can ingest tens of thousands of records per second without breaking a sweat. You can run ad hoc queries using standard SQL . CrateDB's blazing fast distributed query…
read the full CrateDB overview →
About SmartIR
⚠️ Warning You are free to fork, modify, and use the code in this repository in accordance with the applicable open source license. However, the name "SmartIR" must not be used in any capacity , especially for promoting, rebranding, or distributing your own fork or derivative works. Please respect this guideline to preserve the original project's identity. Overview SmartIR is a custom integration for controlling climate devices , media players , fans and lights via infrared controllers. SmartIR currently supports the following controllers: Broadlink Xiaomi IR Remote (ChuangmiIr) LOOK.in Remote ESPHome User…
read the full SmartIR overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CrateDB or SmartIR more popular?
CrateDB has 4,449 GitHub stars and SmartIR has 2,855. CrateDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are CrateDB and SmartIR free?
Both are open source. CrateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SmartIR under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CrateDB and SmartIR?
CrateDB is written in Java and SmartIR in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CrateDB or SmartIR?
Choose CrateDB if you want the larger community (4,449 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SmartIR if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.