head to head · open source
CrateDB vs ha-llmvision
CrateDB has 4,453 GitHub stars, 624 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ha-llmvision has 1,530 stars, 161 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. CrateDB leads on adoption by 191% (4,453 vs 1,530 stars). CrateDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ha-llmvision is written in Python under Apache-2.0. CrateDB has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, ha-llmvision 11%. CrateDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| CrateDB | ha-llmvision | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.5K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Java | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-13 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 624 | ⑂ 161 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick CrateDB if
- You weight community size — 4.5K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ha-llmvision if
- You want the ha-llmvision feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and ha-llmvision fits your workflow better
About CrateDB
.. image:: docs/ static/crate logo.svg :alt: CrateDB :target: .. image:: :target: .. image:: :target: .. image:: :target: Help us improve CrateDB by taking our User Survey! About ===== CrateDB is a distributed SQL database that makes it simple to store and analyze massive amounts of data in real time. CrateDB offers the benefits of an SQL database and the scalability and flexibility typically associated with NoSQL databases. Modest CrateDB clusters can ingest tens of thousands of records per second without breaking a sweat. You can run ad hoc queries using standard SQL . CrateDB's blazing fast distributed query…
read the full CrateDB overview →
About ha-llmvision
Visual intelligence for your home. 🌟 Features · ⬇️ Quick Start Guide · 📖 Resources · 🪲 How to report Bugs · ☕ Support Visit Website → LLM Vision is a Home Assistant integration that uses multimodal large language models to analyze images, videos, live camera feeds, and Frigate events. It can also keep track of analyzed events in a timeline, with an optional Timeline Card for your dashboard. Features Supports OpenRouter, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, AWS Bedrock, Azure, Groq, Ollama, Open WebUI, LocalAI and any provider with OpenAI compatible endpoints. Answers questions and provides descriptions of…
read the full ha-llmvision overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is CrateDB or ha-llmvision more popular?
CrateDB has 4,453 GitHub stars and ha-llmvision has 1,530. CrateDB has the larger community by that measure.
Are CrateDB and ha-llmvision free?
Both are open source. CrateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ha-llmvision under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between CrateDB and ha-llmvision?
CrateDB is written in Java and ha-llmvision in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, CrateDB or ha-llmvision?
Choose CrateDB if you want the larger community (4,453 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ha-llmvision if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.