head to head · open source

codegraph vs Orca

codegraph has 71,385 GitHub stars, 4,590 forks, 518 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Orca has 71,278 stars, 4,665 forks, 5,801 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph leads on adoption by 0% (71,385 vs 71,278 stars). codegraph is written in C under MIT; Orca is written in TypeScript under MIT. codegraph has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Orca 7%. Orca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codegraph ★ 71K Orca ★ 71K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

codegraph Orca
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 71K
License MIT MIT
Written in C TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 4.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codegraph if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codegraph profile →

pick Orca if

  • You want the Orca feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Orca fits your workflow better

full Orca profile →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

About Orca

Orca is an agent desktop environment (ADE) that runs multiple AI coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated git worktree. It unifies workflow, monitoring, and collaboration around AI assisted coding across desktop, mobile, and remote runtimes. Built for developers who rely on several AI coding tools simultaneously, Orca eliminates context switching by tracking all agents and their outputs in one place.

read the full Orca overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

codegraph vs OpenCode codegraph vs pi codegraph vs OpenHands codegraph vs Paperclip codegraph vs rtk codegraph vs Cline codegraph vs Aider codegraph vs Continue codegraph vs Tabby codegraph vs Grok Build codegraph vs T3 Code codegraph vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is codegraph or Orca more popular?

codegraph has 71,385 GitHub stars and Orca has 71,278. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are codegraph and Orca free?

Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and Orca under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codegraph and Orca?

codegraph is written in C and Orca in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codegraph or Orca?

Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (71,385 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Orca if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.