head to head · open source
Orca vs codegraph
Orca has 113,485 GitHub stars, 7,169 forks, 5,801 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph has 76,235 stars, 5,066 forks, 233 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Orca leads on adoption by 49% (113,485 vs 76,235 stars). Orca is written in TypeScript under MIT; codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT. Orca has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, codegraph 7%. Orca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Orca | codegraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 113K | ★ 76K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.2K | ⑂ 5.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Orca if
- You weight community size — 113K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codegraph if
- You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better
About Orca
Orca 中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Português The AI Orchestrator for 100x builders. Run Codex, ClaudeCode, OpenCode or Pi side by side — each in its own worktree, tracked in one place. Download Orca Features Mobile Companion Monitor and steer your agents from your phone — get notified when an agent finishes and send follow ups from anywhere. iOS App Store · TestFlight · Android APK 0.0.48 · Docs → Parallel Worktrees Fan one prompt across five agents, each in its own isolated git worktree — compare the results and merge the winner. Docs → Terminal Splits Ghostty class terminals with WebGL rendering…
About codegraph
CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…
read the full codegraph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Orca or codegraph more popular?
Orca has 113,485 GitHub stars and codegraph has 76,235. Orca has the larger community by that measure.
Are Orca and codegraph free?
Both are open source. Orca is licensed under MIT and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Orca and codegraph?
Orca is written in TypeScript and codegraph in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Orca or codegraph?
Choose Orca if you want the larger community (113,485 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.