head to head · open source
caveman vs codegraph
caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars, 6,789 forks, 155 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph has 76,235 stars, 5,066 forks, 233 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. caveman leads on adoption by 53% (116,900 vs 76,235 stars). caveman is written in Go under Apache-2.0; codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT. caveman has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, codegraph 7%. caveman was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| caveman | codegraph | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 117K | ★ 76K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.8K | ⑂ 5.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick caveman if
- You weight community size — 117K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codegraph if
- You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better
About caveman
why use many token when few do trick Your AI coding agent bills by the word and writes like it knows that. Caveman make it stop. ▶️ ThePrimeagen reacts: "No way this actually works" 🏆 1 on GitHub Trending · July 2026 · 🥇 1 Repository of the Day on Trendshift · April 2026 1 on Hacker News · 904 points · 366 comments · 8 Product of the Day on Product Hunt 📄 Cited in CAVEWOMAN , an Adobe Research paper that measured caveman style output cutting cost 1.4 to 2.4×, up to 3× · 🧪 Tested by JetBrains on 86 real coding tasks: "costs you nothing measurable in quality" ⚡ One command, no account, no API key. npx skills…
read the full caveman overview →
About codegraph
CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…
read the full codegraph overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More AI Assisted Coding projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.
Frequently asked questions
Is caveman or codegraph more popular?
caveman has 116,900 GitHub stars and codegraph has 76,235. caveman has the larger community by that measure.
Are caveman and codegraph free?
Both are open source. caveman is licensed under Apache-2.0 and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between caveman and codegraph?
caveman is written in Go and codegraph in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, caveman or codegraph?
Choose caveman if you want the larger community (116,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.