head to head · open source

OpenCode vs codegraph

OpenCode has 208,243 GitHub stars, 27,369 forks, 5,727 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph has 71,385 stars, 4,590 forks, 518 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. OpenCode leads on adoption by 192% (208,243 vs 71,385 stars). OpenCode is written in TypeScript under MIT; codegraph is written in C under MIT. OpenCode has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, codegraph 6%. OpenCode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCode ★ 208K codegraph ★ 71K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCode codegraph
GitHub stars ★ 208K ★ 71K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 4.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCode if

  • You weight community size — 208K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCode profile →

pick codegraph if

  • You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better

full codegraph profile →

About OpenCode

OpenCode is an open source AI coding agent designed to operate across terminal, IDE, and desktop environments. It integrates directly into developer workflows to assist with writing, editing, and understanding code using natural language prompts. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it runs locally or via a desktop app and supports multiple languages and platforms.

read the full OpenCode overview →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit opencode vs nango opencode vs jitsu opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo opencode vs orbital opencode vs hercules opencode vs argos openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenCode vs pi OpenCode vs OpenHands OpenCode vs Paperclip OpenCode vs rtk OpenCode vs Orca OpenCode vs Cline OpenCode vs Aider OpenCode vs Continue OpenCode vs Tabby OpenCode vs Grok Build OpenCode vs T3 Code OpenCode vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCode or codegraph more popular?

OpenCode has 208,243 GitHub stars and codegraph has 71,385. OpenCode has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCode and codegraph free?

Both are open source. OpenCode is licensed under MIT and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCode and codegraph?

OpenCode is written in TypeScript and codegraph in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCode or codegraph?

Choose OpenCode if you want the larger community (208,243 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.