head to head · open source

Paperclip vs codegraph

Paperclip has 80,953 GitHub stars, 14,860 forks, 5,464 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph has 71,385 stars, 4,590 forks, 518 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Paperclip leads on adoption by 13% (80,953 vs 71,385 stars). Paperclip is written in TypeScript under MIT; codegraph is written in C under MIT. Paperclip has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, codegraph 6%. Paperclip was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Paperclip ★ 81K codegraph ★ 71K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Paperclip codegraph
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 71K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 4.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Paperclip if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Paperclip profile →

pick codegraph if

  • You want the codegraph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and codegraph fits your workflow better

full codegraph profile →

About Paperclip

Paperclip is an open source orchestration platform for managing teams of AI agents in production environments. It lives in the Node.js and React ecosystem and is licensed under MIT. The project addresses the operational chaos that arises when deploying multiple autonomous AI agents—such as OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor—across an organization. Without coordination, teams face untraceable workflows, runaway costs, misaligned goals, and poor governance. Paperclip solves this by providing a unified dashboard that enforces org structure, budget controls, goal alignment, and auditability across heterogeneous …

read the full Paperclip overview →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs openhands hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Paperclip vs OpenCode Paperclip vs pi Paperclip vs OpenHands Paperclip vs rtk Paperclip vs Orca Paperclip vs Cline Paperclip vs Aider Paperclip vs Continue Paperclip vs Tabby Paperclip vs Grok Build Paperclip vs T3 Code Paperclip vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is Paperclip or codegraph more popular?

Paperclip has 80,953 GitHub stars and codegraph has 71,385. Paperclip has the larger community by that measure.

Are Paperclip and codegraph free?

Both are open source. Paperclip is licensed under MIT and codegraph under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Paperclip and codegraph?

Paperclip is written in TypeScript and codegraph in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Paperclip or codegraph?

Choose Paperclip if you want the larger community (80,953 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codegraph if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.