head to head · open source

codegraph vs Continue

codegraph has 76,235 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Continue has 36,400 stars, 5,542 forks, 951 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codegraph leads on adoption by 109% (76,235 vs 36,400 stars). codegraph is written in TypeScript under MIT; Continue is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. codegraph has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Continue 15%. Continue was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codegraph ★ 76K Continue ★ 36K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

codegraph Continue
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 36K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-01 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 5.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codegraph if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codegraph profile →

pick Continue if

  • You want the Continue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Continue fits your workflow better

full Continue profile →

About codegraph

CodeGraph Already installed? Run codegraph upgrade Follow @getcodegraph on X for updates. Supercharge Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, OpenCode, Hermes Agent, Gemini, Antigravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and more with Semantic Code Intelligence The fastest complete code graph · surgical context · built for how agents actually work · 100% local Kernel powered by Rust Documentation & Website → The CodeGraph platform is coming — for every PR, know exactly what to test, what could break, which flows are affected, and whether business logic is compromised. Get early beta access to the hosted product · getcodegraph.com…

read the full codegraph overview →

About Continue

Continue Pioneering open source coding agent What is Continue? Note: The continuedev/continue repository is no longer actively maintained and is read only for all users. Continue is a coding agent available as a CLI, VS Code extension, and JetBrains plugin. Documentation To learn how to configure Continue, how it works, and how to customize it, check out the Continue Docs. Final 2.0.0 Release We polished Continue and did a final 2.0.0 release of the VS Code extension, CLI, and JetBrains plugin. This included removing anonymous telemetry, pulling out authentication, squashing bugs, and more. VS Code CLI JetBrains…

read the full Continue overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Frequently asked questions

Is codegraph or Continue more popular?

codegraph has 76,235 GitHub stars and Continue has 36,400. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are codegraph and Continue free?

Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT and Continue under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between codegraph and Continue?

codegraph is written in TypeScript and Continue in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codegraph or Continue?

Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (76,235 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Continue if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.