[opensourcedex]

head to head · open source

ant-design vs zag

ant-design has 99,646 GitHub stars, 54,692 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. zag has 5,220 stars, 291 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ant-design leads on adoption by 1,809% (99,646 vs 5,220 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; zag is written in TypeScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, zag 6%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (design-systems, react), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K zag ★ 5.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design zag
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 5.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-30 2026-09-30
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 291
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick zag if

  • You want the zag feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and zag fits your workflow better

full zag profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About zag

Zag is an MIT licensed TypeScript library of framework agnostic, headless component state machines for building an accessible design system once and consuming it in React, Solid, Vue, Svelte or vanilla JavaScript.

read the full zag overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs primitives ant-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or zag more popular?

ant-design has 99,646 GitHub stars and zag has 5,220. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and zag free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and zag under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and zag?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and zag in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or zag?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,646 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zag if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.