[opensourcedex]

head to head · open source

ant-design vs Pow

ant-design has 99,682 GitHub stars, 54,688 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped today. Pow has 4,411 stars, 200 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 2,160% (99,682 vs 4,411 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; Pow is written in Swift under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, Pow 5%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K Pow ★ 4.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design Pow
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 4.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-04-13
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 200
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick Pow if

  • You want the Pow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Pow fits your workflow better

full Pow profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About Pow

Pow is an open source Swift package of SwiftUI transitions and value change effects for iOS, macOS, Mac Catalyst and visionOS developers who want polished animation and haptics without writing them by hand.

read the full Pow overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K OpenCut ★ 92K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs primitives ant-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or Pow more popular?

ant-design has 99,682 GitHub stars and Pow has 4,411. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and Pow free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and Pow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and Pow?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and Pow in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or Pow?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,682 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.